Every review on this list is built from data we hold rather than from an operator’s press kit: licence and company details, KYC policy, deposit and withdrawal terms, provably fair implementation, in-house game RTP, bonus structure, and — for the operators whose wallets we have labelled — measured on-chain deposit and withdrawal flow across seven chains.
Scoring uses ten weighted categories with published weights, so any ranking here can be reproduced or re-weighted for what you personally care about. Nobody can buy a score, a position, or a link.
Why some entries carry no score
Where we do not hold enough verified data across the rubric, we say so and withhold the number instead of publishing a guess. Those entries are marked data-limited, kept out of rankings and out of our sitemap until the gaps are filled.
It is a deliberate trade-off: fewer scored casinos, but every published score means something.
What we measure ourselves
On-chain flow, hot wallet balances, live bet samples from public feeds, observed payout ratios and per-casino RTP builds are all our own measurements. Licence terms, limits and bonus mechanics are the operator’s own published claims, checked against their terms — we label which is which inside each review.
Frequently asked
Do casinos pay to be listed or rated higher?
No. There is no paid placement and no affiliate-driven ordering. The rubric and its weights are published precisely so the ranking can be checked.
How current are the numbers?
On-chain and bet-feed figures update continuously; platform terms are re-checked when we revisit a review. Each review states which figures are snapshots and links to the live version.
What if a review is wrong?
Our methodology lists exactly what we check and how each number is derived, so an error can be pointed at specifically. We would rather correct a figure than defend one.