Casino Health Score

Health scores from our own on-chain data: payout ratio, flow stability, payout activity, whale honouring and 7-day trend. Components published.

How the health score is built

The health score is a heuristic for one narrow question: does this operator behave like a business that pays its players? It combines five measured components — payout ratio at 35%, flow stability at 20%, payout activity at 20%, whale honouring at 15% and the seven-day trend at 10% — and every component is returned alongside the score so you can disagree with the weighting instead of the arithmetic.

All five come from our own on-chain index. Nothing is self-reported, nothing is supplied by the operators, and no operator can pay to move a score.

What each component measures

Payout ratio compares withdrawals to deposits over 30 days. A figure near the theoretical range is healthy; a very low one raises a question, and a figure above 100% usually indicates internal transfers counted as withdrawals rather than a casino losing money.

Flow stability looks for lumpy, irregular movement. Payout activity checks that withdrawals happen continuously rather than in occasional batches. Whale honouring asks whether large withdrawals actually clear. The trend component catches operators whose behaviour has changed in the last week.

Deliberate limits

This is not a solvency audit, a credit rating or financial advice. It cannot see off-chain balances, fiat rails, or funds held with payment processors, and a good score is not a guarantee about your specific withdrawal.

It is also coverage-dependent: an operator whose wallets we have labelled less completely will show less flow. Where that materially affects a conclusion, we say so on the review itself rather than quietly scoring it lower.

Frequently asked

Is a grade A casino safe?

It means the on-chain behaviour we can measure looks like an operator paying players normally. It is a signal, not a warranty, and it says nothing about licensing quality or dispute handling.

Why does a casino I know is large score lower than a small one?

Because the score measures behaviour, not size. A large operator sweeping funds irregularly or paying out in batches can score below a small one with steady, continuous flow.

Can operators influence their score?

Only by changing what they do on-chain, which is the entire point. There is no submission process, no paid review and no appeal.