A continuous proof-of-funds ratio: tracked hot-wallet reserves divided by observed daily payout volume, snapshotted every collector round, with deterioration flags. Conservative on both sides — reserves are a floor, exposure is a sample.
Every collector round we divide the latest balance snapshot of each casino's publicly labelled hot wallets by its average daily payout over the trailing 30 days of observed bet feeds. The result is coverage in days: how many days of the payout volume we actually observe the tracked wallets could cover. Latest snapshot: 2026-10-01, 7 casinos scored on both data sides.
Both inputs are conservative. Reserves are a floor — only publicly labelled wallets are counted, so real reserves are higher. Exposure is a partial sample — the bet feeds do not cover sportsbook volume or unobserved games, so real payout volume is higher too. A low figure means tracked wallets cover few days of observed volume; it is not, and must not be read as, a solvency verdict.
| Casino | Tracked reserves | Avg daily payout (30d) | Coverage | 7d change | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stake | $157.5M | $14.7M | 10.7 days | -36% | — |
| Rainbet | $84.9M | $8.0M | 10.6 days | -6% | — |
| Duelbits | $7.0M | $4.4M | 1.6 days | +50153% | low |
| Shuffle | $26.9M | $19.2M | 1.4 days | +17% | low |
| 500 Casino | $832.3K | $3.7M | 0.2 days | -45% | low, falling |
| Duel | $12.4M | $83.8M | 0.1 days | +3% | low |
| Gamdom | $3.5M | $65.7M | 0.1 days | -46% | low, falling |
This is not a solvency verdict and never will be. Cold storage, unlabelled wallets and off-feed volume are all invisible to this page. The flags are descriptive, not accusatory: "low" marks coverage under two days of observed volume, "falling" marks a drop of more than 40% versus seven days ago. Both are prompts to look closer — at the vault balance history and the casino's review — not conclusions.
Formula: coverage_days = tracked reserves USD ÷ (30d observed payout USD ÷ 30). Payout-side context on the daily on-chain dashboard.
If a casino kept paying out at exactly the average daily rate we observed over the last 30 days, and no new deposits arrived, coverage is the number of days the currently tracked hot-wallet balances would last. It is a ratio of two measurements, both of ours: latest wallet snapshot divided by trailing average daily payout. Nothing about it is reported by the casino.
Because both sides understate reality. The reserve figure counts only wallets we have publicly labelled — treasuries almost always hold more in cold storage and unlabelled addresses. The payout figure counts only the bet feeds we observe — sportsbooks and unobserved games pay out too. The ratio answers one narrow question: how many days of observed payouts could tracked wallets cover. A casino we cannot score is listed as not scored, never as failed.
A continuous coverage ratio can go down, and publishing a deterioration flag against a partner endangers the revenue stream the affiliate exists to collect. One-off proof-of-reserves certifications avoid the problem by measuring once, on a chosen day. We have no operator relationships, so we can snapshot the ratio every collector round and show the trend line whichever way it moves.
Once per collector round, on the same schedule as our balance snapshots — roughly every six hours. The table shows the latest round; the 7-day change compares against the newest round at least a week old, so very new coverage stays marked as no-change rather than fabricating a trend.