Which crypto casinos actually take the deposits: on-chain market share of deposit volume per operator over 7 and 30 days, with week-over-week share movement, measured from labelled hot wallets.
Tracked deposit volume across our wallet registry totals $496.6M over the last 7 days ($105.9M the period before). Shares are computed from observed on-chain transfers only — a lower bound, since unregistered wallets are invisible.
| Casino | Volume (7d) | Share | Δ share (pp) | Δ volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stake | $135.6M | 27.3% | +27.3 | +996883651520% |
| Gamba | $133.8M | 26.9% | -35.8 | +101% |
| Roobet | $43.6M | 8.8% | +8.8 | +1018501% |
| Shuffle | $38.4M | 7.7% | -14.3 | +65% |
| Rollbit | $18.6M | 3.7% | +3.7 | +267418% |
| Duel | $18.2M | 3.7% | +3.7 | new |
| BitStarz | $17.0M | 3.4% | +3.4 | new |
| Gamdom | $15.1M | 3.0% | +3.0 | +555790% |
| Winna | $11.5M | 2.3% | +2.3 | +373014% |
| Rainbet | $9.9M | 2.0% | -3.3 | +78% |
| Vave | $8.1M | 1.6% | +1.6 | new |
| Thrill | $5.9M | 1.2% | +1.2 | new |
| Cloudbet | $5.5M | 1.1% | +1.0 | +4927% |
| Bitcasino | $5.4M | 1.1% | +1.0 | +10202% |
| Sportsbet.io | $5.4M | 1.1% | +1.1 | new |
Daily per-casino flow on the blockchain dashboard; long-run deposit/withdrawal series on the GGR tracker.
Stake leads with 27.3% of tracked volume, and the top three operators together hold 63.0% — concentration that matters when any one of them changes deposit policy or chain mix. The biggest share move belongs to Stake (+27.3 pp), against Gamba at -35.8 pp. Tracked volume itself moved up 369% period-over-period — share shifts are only meaningful against that tide. Shares are of REGISTERED wallets only: an operator looking lighter here may simply hold more of its float on chains or addresses we have not labelled yet.
Three practical notes for reading share moves. First, windows overlap reality: a seven-day share can swing on one whale weekend, which is why the delta columns sit next to the volumes and not alone. Second, chains are not equal: our registry's coverage is deepest on ETH and TRX, thinner on some SOL and EVM-L2 clusters, so operators weighted to well-covered chains look proportionally larger. Third, share is zero-sum only within what we see — the honest denominator is registered volume, not the market. When an operator's share and the total both fall, that is a coverage story; when share falls on a rising total, players are actually moving.