Live industry mood for crypto casinos: per-casino trust scores 0-100 with a full per-source breakdown — community reviews, editorial scores, provably-fair audits and on-chain tracking. See exactly where every score comes from.
Distribution: 56 positive, 25 neutral, 1 negative. 60 casinos are scored from at least two independent signals. Snapshot computed 2026-08-18.
| Casino | Trust score | Level | Community | Editorial | Fairness | On-chain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stake | 95/100 | High | 4.72★ (16,487 reviews) | 91 | 10/10 | tracked |
| StakeUS | 94/100 | High | 4.80★ (1,328 reviews) | 91 | — | tracked |
| Shuffle | 90/100 | High | 4.50★ (3,950 reviews) | 86 | 9.5/10 | tracked |
| Damble | 90/100 | High | 4.53★ (3,258 reviews) | 89 | — | — |
| Blazeninja | 88/100 | High | 4.57★ (7,552 reviews) | 82 | — | — |
| 22 Bitcasino | 88/100 | High | 4.71★ (6,031 reviews) | 77 | — | — |
| Solpot | 87/100 | High | 4.55★ (6,205 reviews) | 80 | — | — |
| Degencity | 87/100 | High | 4.77★ (4,904 reviews) | 70 | — | — |
| Flipgg | 85/100 | High | 4.52★ (4,812 reviews) | 75 | — | — |
| Dustbit | 85/100 | High | — | 85 | — | — |
| Thrill | 84/100 | High | 4.17★ (651 reviews) | 81 | 9/10 | tracked |
| Betplay | 84/100 | High | 4.17★ (4,152 reviews) | 85 | — | — |
| Winna | 84/100 | High | 4.16★ (1,457 reviews) | 85 | — | tracked |
| Duel | 83/100 | High | 4.49★ (554 reviews) | 82 | 7.5/10 | tracked |
| BC.GAME | 83/100 | High | 4.30★ (2,281 reviews) | 69 | 9/10 | tracked |
Overall = 50% community + 25% editorial + 25% fairness. Community is a Bayesian-shrunk average rating (prior 3.0/5, weight 25) mapped to 0–100; fairness is the 0–10 provably-fair rubric scaled by ten. Missing signals renormalize the remaining weights and render as "—" — no imputation, no artificial boosts. Levels: ≥70 High, 45–69.9 Medium, below 45 Low.
Three signals are blended into a 0-100 score: community sentiment (50%), our editorial review score (25%) and our provably-fair audit (25%). Community sentiment is the average player rating mapped to 0-100, editorial is the weighted WagerDB review score, and the fairness audit (0-10 rubric covering verifiability, player control, documentation and edge transparency) is scaled by ten. When a signal is missing for a casino, the remaining weights are renormalized and the column shows "—" — we never invent a value to fill the gap.
A raw average over-trusts small samples: a casino with two 5-star reviews would outrank one with 10,000 reviews averaging 4.7. We shrink every average toward a neutral prior of 3.0/5 with a prior weight of 25 pseudo-reviews, so (n × rating + 25 × 3.0) / (n + 25). With few reviews the score stays near a cautious 60/100; as real reviews accumulate, the data takes over and the prior becomes negligible.
Four of our own datasets, no third-party API: (1) community review statistics collected on WagerDB — average rating, review count and complaint count; (2) our editorial review scores, a weighted rubric across ten categories from bonuses to compliance; (3) our provably-fair audits, where we independently verify each casino's commit-reveal scheme; and (4) our on-chain wallet registry, the casinos whose hot and cold wallets we monitor across multiple blockchains. The on-chain flag is shown for transparency but is not part of the numeric score.
The page is regenerated from the underlying datasets whenever they change — community stats and editorial scores update continuously as reviews are published or re-scored, fairness audits are re-run when a casino changes its verification scheme, and the on-chain registry grows as we add wallet coverage. The "computed" timestamp at the top of the table shows when the current snapshot was built.
It means we do not hold that signal for the casino: no player reviews yet (community), no completed editorial review, or no provably-fair audit — typically because the casino has no verifiable RNG documentation to audit. Rather than guessing, we renormalize the remaining weights and disclose the gap. A score built from fewer sources is still real data, but you can see exactly how much evidence sits behind it.