Deposit Size Distribution

On-chain histogram of deposit sizes across 40+ crypto casinos: from sub-$100 tickets to $1M+ whale transfers. Per-casino matrix, count/volume and chain filters.

Who plays what stakes — deposit size distribution, 30 days

Every observed on-chain deposit to a tracked casino wallet in the last 30 days, bucketed by size: 950,143 deposits worth $1.43B in total. The shape tells you who the casino actually serves — micro-stakes volume, mid-stakes regulars or whale traffic.

Casino<$100$100–$1K$1K–$10K$10K–$100K$100K–$1M$1M+
Gamba136,31034,64414,0713,86180626
Stake67,33235,68810,0211,44214530
Shuffle99,98251,95510,8401,7881459
Roobet30,02316,1653,2146373738
Rainbet160,78237,8995,694683596
Winna5,1382,6308486910019
Duel7,12311,4272,9976891042
Gamdom2,60816,2733,096504616
Rollbit6,4272,5211,237490877
BitStarz13,1255,568849239683
Bitcasino3,3711,142476282802
Sportsbet.io1,01054315022397
BC.GAME2,4631,84345536307
Vave8,0283,864888303330
Thrill12,9235,8501,242203170

Counts only, 30-day window, wallets from our registry. Cross-reference with market share.

What the shape tells you

15 tracked casinos split 950,143 deposits worth $1.43B across 6 size buckets, an average ticket of $1.5K — an average dragged upward by the tail, which is the point of bucketing rather than averaging. Gamba alone accounts for 27.7% of tracked volume in this window. A casino whose mass sits in the smallest buckets is serving recreational volume it can afford to lose on bonuses; one whose volume concentrates in the top buckets lives and dies by a handful of whales — a liquidity risk its own reserve policy has to absorb, and one you can watch directly on the vault history page. The same deposit landing in different buckets also changes what the GGR proxy means: high-roller windows swing on single sessions.